Eren Yeager and this Essay on the Philosophical Landscape of Morality

In the expansive realm of "Attack on Titan," Eren Yeager emerges not just as a character but as a philosophical force, challenging the very fabric of morality. This blog unravels the layers of Eren's character, exploring the nuances of subjective and objective morality, and delving into the universal and individual aspects of what defines "good" and "bad."

Eren's character embarks on a journey that transcends the boundaries of traditional storytelling. As he grapples with the weight of responsibility, the consequences of his choices, and the pursuit of freedom, viewers are thrust into a philosophical exploration of morality in the face of existential threats.

Eren Yeager's character in "Attack on Titan" carries a philosophical depth. His evolution throughout the series prompts contemplation on complex themes such as freedom, morality, sacrifice, and the cyclical nature of history. Eren's journey challenges traditional notions of heroism and explores the consequences of extreme actions in pursuit of what he perceives as freedom for his people.

His philosophical complexity lies in the exploration of existential questions and the moral ambiguity surrounding his decisions. Eren grapples with the weight of responsibility, the ethical implications of his choices, and the cyclical nature of conflict that spans generations.

As with many philosophical characters, Eren sparks discussions on the blurred lines between right and wrong, the subjective nature of morality, and the impact of personal convictions on the course of history. His character invites viewers to reflect on the complexities of human nature, the consequences of power, and the pursuit of freedom in a world rife with moral dilemmas.

At a point in time, I thought to myself that morality stems from humanity's nature to do good. But, sometimes what's good or bad is blurred depending on who is speaking and what their intentions are. But at the same time, I think, there are basic morals among people that does not need any argument.

Now, this perspective touches on a fundamental debate in philosophy—whether morality is objective or subjective. It's a nuanced discussion that has been explored by thinkers throughout history.

The concept of subjective morality acknowledges that individual perspectives, cultural contexts, and personal intentions can influence how people perceive what is "good" or "bad." It recognizes the variability of moral values and ethical judgments based on diverse backgrounds and experiences.

However, this observation about basic morals shared among people aligns with aspects of both perspectives. Some philosophers argue for a form of moral realism, asserting that there are objective moral truths that exist independently of personal beliefs. These might be considered fundamental principles that are widely recognized and accepted across cultures.

In essence, the tension between subjective and objective morality highlights the complex nature of human ethics. While there may be universal principles that many agree upon, the interpretation and application of those principles can still vary.

Eren Yeager's character in "Attack on Titan" navigates this philosophical terrain, questioning the nature of morality, the legitimacy of authority, and the justifiability of extreme actions in the pursuit of what he believes is right. The series, in many ways, invites viewers to ponder these ethical dilemmas and consider where they stand on the spectrum of subjective and objective morality.